C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır Hakkında Gerçekler Açığa

C# IList Nasıl Kullanılır Hakkında Gerçekler Açığa

Blog Article

It's always best to use the lowest base type possible. This gives the implementer of your interface, or consumer of your method, the opportunity to use whatever they like behind the scenes.

1 @supercat: What could ISortableList offer that's derece already in IList? Or, asked differently, why couldn't an IList be sorted in-place without re-adding the items by your imagined static method?

Say I have a function that returns IEnumerable, inside the function I may use a List for an internal backing store to generate my collection, but I only want callers to enumerate it's contents, hamiş add or remove. Accepting an interface as a parameter communicates a similar message "I need a collection of strings, don't worry though, I won't change it."

Bearing this in mind, it makes most sense to pass types with the least number of external dependencies possible and to return the same. However, this could be different depending on the visibility of your methods and their signatures.

IList is a interface and doesn't have any implementation, so the performance of IList depending the class it implements

List is a specific implementation of IList, which is a container that emanet be addressed the same way birli a linear array T[] using an integer index. When you specify IList C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız birli the type of the method's argument, you only specify that you need certain capabilities of the container. For example, the interface specification does hamiş enforce a specific data structure to be used.

GitHub'da C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız bizimle ortaklık örgün Bu derunğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada başkaca problemlerı ve çekme isteklerini oluşturup gözden geçirebilirsiniz. Henüz bir tomar bilim dâhilin yardımda mevcut kılavuzumuzu C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor inceleyin.

3 @phoog: Considering where Eric is coming from, it wouldn't be surprising he is more cautious about breaking changes. But it is definitely a valid point.

Bir dahaki sefere değerlendirme yaptığımda kullanılmak üzere girişimı, e-posta adresimi ve web site adresimi bu C# IList Kullanımı tarayıcıya kaydet.

Taking LinkedList vs taking List vs IList all communicate something of the performance guarantees required by the code being called.

IList is not a class; it's an interface that classes kişi implement. The interface itself is just a contract between the consumer of the class and the class itself. This line of code will work:

The most important case for using interfaces over implementations is in the parameters to your API. If your API takes a List parameter, then anyone who uses it has to use List.

I have two ILists of the same type returned by NHibernate and have emerged the two IList into one, hence the need for sorting.

Bu şekilde, Dog dershaneı IAnimal interface’inin sözleşmesine uymuş evet. Aynı şekilde, gayrı efsanevi sınıfları da IAnimal interface’ini C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız uygulayabilir. Örneğin, süflidaki kodda bir Cat derslikı tanılamamladım ve IAnimal interface’ini uyguladım.